According to North (1982) the concept of neutrality in the market place is a myth. The myth, extended to education, has created an opportunity for the enemies of Jesus Christ to gain control of the institutions that drive culture. Sadly, Christian Evangelicalism and Christian Fundamentalism, because of the influence of Pietism, have been on the cutting edge of promoting marketplace neutrality. North’s answer to the problem, and anticipation of Fundamentalism’s response to the solution is as follows:
What is the proper argument? Simple: there is no neutrality, and since there is no neutrality, the present legal foundation of government-funded education is a fraud. Conclusion: close every government-financed school tomorrow. Refund the taxes to the tax-payers. Let the taxpayers seek out their own schools for their children, at their expense (or from privately financed scholarships or other donations). No more fraud. No more institutions built on the myth of neutrality. But the fundamentalists instinctively shy away from such a view. Why? Because they see where it necessarily leads: to a theocracy in which no public funds can be appropriated for anti-Christian activities, or to anarchy, where there are no public funds to appropriate. It must lead to God’s civil government or no civil government. In short, it leads either to Rushdoony or Rothbard. Most fundamentalists have never heard of either man, but they instinctively recognize where the abandonment of the myth of neutrality could lead them (North, 1982. p. 20).
Quite rightly, non-Christians object to state-raised funds being used for purposes that promote the Christian religion. This is perfectly consistent with the reality of there being no neutrality in the marketplace. The religion of the marketplace is Secular Humanism (proclaimed a religion by Humanists themselves*). This is the pressure that is applied to so-called Christian Schools that receive government funds to be established and sustained. Humanist tax-payers object to their tax dollars being used to promote a rival religion. The government-funded Christian schools, if they are not fully controlled by government agendas at the moment, shall be completely controlled in the future. He who pays the piper calls the tune. The only way for Christian education to be conducted in a Christian way, under the Lordship of Jesus Christ, and in accordance with the Word of God, is for Christians to stop receiving government subsidies. Initially this will be extremely painful. It will mean shouldering the full responsibility for the education of their children. Christians will also need to pay the full tithe to the Lord, and churches will need to shoulder their full social welfare responsibilities, which includes helping the righteous poor families fulfill their educational responsibilities.
It was Fundamentalist Evangelicalism that led the charge towards the secularization of Education in Australia. According to Barcan (1980):
In September 1874 James Greenwood, a Baptist minister who was also a journalist on the Sydney Morning Herald, formed a Public School League whose objective was a ‘national, free, secular and compulsory’ system (Barcan, 1980, p. 139).
The Christian church in Australia is addicted to procuring government funds. Think of the funds being given to the Salvation Army, Baptist Care, Catholic Care, Frontier Services, Anglicare, etc. Government money for the Lord’s work. Try preaching the gospel to the recipients of the welfare distributed through these organizations – challenge the recipients with the crown rights of Jesus Christ the Lord and King – and see what response comes from the funding source: “Shut up, or the funds will dry up.” In the early days of these organisations, when the money came from the church’s tithes and offerings, listening to the gospel was often a condition for receiving the welfare distribution – in many cases it was failing to obey the gospel which got people into trouble in the first place.
Well done, those Christian families who have fully owned their responsibility to educate their own children, by bringing them home and giving them a home-based education. Well done to those families who have paid the financial cost of educating from home. I applaud your efforts. And may the Triune God reward you abundantly for your faithfulness to Him.
* Dunphy, J. (1983). A Religion for a New Age. The Humanist, Jan-Feb.; Potter, C. F. (1930). Humanism a New Religion. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
Barcan, A. (1980). A History of Australian Education. Melbourne, VIC: Oxford University Press.
Dunphy, J. (1983). A Religion for a New Age. The Humanist, Jan-Feb
North, G. (1982). The Intellectual Schizophrenia of the New Christian Right, Symposium on The Failure of the American Baptist Culture. U.S.A.: Geneva Divinity School, Christianity and Civilization Vol. 1. Editors Jordan, J. B. and North, G.
Potter, C. F. (1930). Humanism a New Religion. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.